20 Comments
User's avatar
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I say BINGO! I gave the Trump "win" a probability of 95+% before the ritual. There was some probability They would make a "surprise" "win" for Special K, and get a revolt going so They can "put Us down." Good examination!

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Thank you very much. The question now is given his selection, what do the banks have planned for the next year or so?

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

True. I have several possibilities but they’re all over the place. LOL!

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Yea, same, but I mean I'm sure https://egalv.substack.com/ and whitney webb can tell us.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Thanks for the link!!!

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

I can't take it anymore... was his cry.... But why have elections, ? There are other vways......

We are all slaves to nature's laws, and the nature of life exists in Survival of the Fittest arenas,,,

Expand full comment
Aaron Graham's avatar

Trump "was the only legitimate choice"? The antidemocratic, hated by his own ex-vice president, narcissistic, incontinent, senile, emotional, reckless, MEAN SPIRITED convicted felon was the only legitimate choice? You might want to revisit your analysis.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Yes. Kamala was not chosen by election. Vice presidents are appointed, and Biden's DNC canceled the primary that would have allowed us to choose his replacement. Snap elections are a thing and there was no legal requirement stopping them from having one. What's hard to understand here? She was appointed, twice. And not elected. By any democratic metric she was an illegitimate candidate.

Trump may be atrocious but he was voted on, several times. He crushed his primaries, and they weren't constrained fakes like the DNC rounds were. The anti trump RNC types had every opportunity to find someone better and run against him, and they tried.

I agree that it says something, but the fact is, he's a legitimate candidate. Kamala never was.

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

If Kamala and Donald are part of this conversation, why isn't Jill?

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Because she only got 1% of the vote because Americans are profoundly stupid and evil, or at least walking unconscious. She should have at least got her 5% but once again people are brain dead.

Expand full comment
Aaron Graham's avatar

Vice-presidents are not appointed. Kamala Harris was elected vice-president just as much as Joe Biden was elected president. Primaries don't really matter, and they don't force the party to choose a candidate, since the parties are private companies, and almost every single DNC delegate chose Kamala Harris over the other choices. Biden endorsed her, he didn't anoint her, Democrat voters obviously wanted her over any other possibility that was forwarded.

Sure, Trump crushed his primaries, and however else you want to praise him. He also tried to overthrow the government in 2020, doesn't respect the rule of law, directed his various departments to maliciously further his own interests, is a convicted rapist, and has never given a real policy position. "Do you have a plan?" "I have concepts of a plan."

The man is the head of a cult, and now he's entering the White House knowing that he has criminal immunity this time around. Remember, his own damn side doesn't even claim that he didn't try to overthrow the election. They just claim that it was an official act.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

I gave you all the data in the world. You're not interested in actual understanding. Which is fine. You don't have a say anyway unless you're willing to go on strike, and basically no one is.

All the plot points from this season of USGTV fail to interest me. It's all as empty to me as legacy between match WWF banter. https://innomen.substack.com/p/we-dont-have-a-government

Expand full comment
Aaron Graham's avatar

That's the extent of your reply? Really? Do you acknowledge that you were wrong in saying that vice-presidents aren't appointed? Do you also acknowledge that Trump submitted false slates of electors and tried to coerce Pence to arbitrarily choose him as president, thereby making any accusation of Kamala as an "illegitimate" candidate ridiculous in comparison? Please just answer these simple questions.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Not remotely. You're eye deep in TDS fandom. I've been dealing with you types since 2016, I have some of you in my own family. Your hair splitting cope about the DNC straight up doing what they said they'd do is amusing and ironic. They literally got together in a back room and picked a candidate.

Trying to spin Kamala as legitimately chosen by the people is manifestly insane. FFS the office of VP isn't even a constitutional role, that's why it doesn't have any power but breaking ties and being a spare.

You VBNMW types are a real trip.

"A lawyer for the DNC, Bruce Spiva, told the judge: “We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into backrooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.’ That’s not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right.”

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/dnc-fraud-lawsuit-exposes-anti-democratic-views-democratic-party/

Expand full comment
Aaron Graham's avatar

So you're not going to answer my -very simple- questions, that's okay. One of the most hilarious things to me is people who screech "TDS TDS TDS" when they're the ones who won't engage with any of Trump's legitimate crimes against the American people. That's real derangement syndrome.

Expand full comment