16 Comments
User's avatar
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

All part of the show.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Offtopic but I thought you should know I'm slowly looking into your terrain theory stuff. https://substack.com/@innomen/note/c-59920222 I relayed your post to a trusted friend to help me parse. https://substack.com/home/post/p-136618915

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

Dig in! The "pandemic pathogen" is one big mythology created for control and profit.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

It's not like the majority of believers attended the meeting to conspire. A step I'm taking in that direction is thinking about the goldfish analogy, and fleas. Recently I had to deal with them, and I didn't do it by taking something into me, I did it by attacking my room. Why should that logic not extend downward?

I'm trying to integrate the idea into a context I understand better, namely the macroscopic world. Also I'm reminded of carbon following heat instead of driving it. Also I'm reminded of pollutants, in the form of metals, PFOs, and endocrine disruptors. Even if some pathogens do exist terrain theory could provide a good holistic framework for parsing the larger system.

Like understanding economics generally over focusing on commodities.

I share all that with you to inform how you might better approach the topic with other fence sitters like myself, or those adjacent.

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

I understand your position, but just know they don't actually isolate viruses and the transmission studies are all failures. Nothing left to sit on but theory at that point.

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

That's much better, and borne out by everything I've seen so far, very well said. I have a huge list of failed transmission studies to explore, but do you have a link for the isolation aspect?

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

This latest work is very clever. They used the standard methodology for virus isolation without a sick host and still found viruses. It exposes virology as a completely unscientific field.

https://dpl003.substack.com/p/the-most-comprehensive-control-studies

Expand full comment
S.M. Carson's avatar

It's occured to me as well that the much (supposedly) despised Trump will be the Elite's next pick for the WH to "move things along." 😀

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

I'm sure. It's been obvious to me for a long time. Another part of this effort is all the semi recent rehabilitation of former right wing monsters, like GW. They aren't fools, they know how to run a TV show. I wish you'd rewrite my gov post, maybe you'd have more luck waking people up to the fact that we literally don't have a government. https://innomen.substack.com/p/we-dont-have-a-government

Expand full comment
S.M. Carson's avatar

I'll check it out. odds are I've been already thinking along the same lines. : )

Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

I hope so but I'd be surprised, I haven't seen anyone else synthesize the DNC fraud lawsuit stuff with the princeton oligarchy study (and maybe banking) to arrive at government being a sham.

These days I'd add a hamas analogy, like how Netanyahu propped up Hamas to prevent an actual government from forming. That is where we are in the states. And I just can't get people to listen. No one cares about my post and it is by far the one I most heavily share.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 29
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 30
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Innomen's avatar

Ahh I see. Well, a quick search gave me this intensely suspect hyper partisan report on the topic that strongly implies to me that the deletion was part of the deal expressly because they are playing the "conservative conspiracy" card. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikileaks-delete-dnc-emails-debunk-assange-plea-deal/

The conditions of the plea could have been in the works for months or even years, it'll be a year before we know all the details if ever. I'm inclined to believe you are right. It's certainly more plausible to me than "technical issues." (Which are no doubt caused by state actors anyway.)

See also: https://x.com/Innomen/status/1807565676833292412

Expand full comment