It's not like the majority of believers attended the meeting to conspire. A step I'm taking in that direction is thinking about the goldfish analogy, and fleas. Recently I had to deal with them, and I didn't do it by taking something into me, I did it by attacking my room. Why should that logic not extend downward?
I'm trying to integrate the idea into a context I understand better, namely the macroscopic world. Also I'm reminded of carbon following heat instead of driving it. Also I'm reminded of pollutants, in the form of metals, PFOs, and endocrine disruptors. Even if some pathogens do exist terrain theory could provide a good holistic framework for parsing the larger system.
Like understanding economics generally over focusing on commodities.
I share all that with you to inform how you might better approach the topic with other fence sitters like myself, or those adjacent.
I understand your position, but just know they don't actually isolate viruses and the transmission studies are all failures. Nothing left to sit on but theory at that point.
That's much better, and borne out by everything I've seen so far, very well said. I have a huge list of failed transmission studies to explore, but do you have a link for the isolation aspect?
This latest work is very clever. They used the standard methodology for virus isolation without a sick host and still found viruses. It exposes virology as a completely unscientific field.
I'm sure. It's been obvious to me for a long time. Another part of this effort is all the semi recent rehabilitation of former right wing monsters, like GW. They aren't fools, they know how to run a TV show. I wish you'd rewrite my gov post, maybe you'd have more luck waking people up to the fact that we literally don't have a government. https://innomen.substack.com/p/we-dont-have-a-government
I hope so but I'd be surprised, I haven't seen anyone else synthesize the DNC fraud lawsuit stuff with the princeton oligarchy study (and maybe banking) to arrive at government being a sham.
These days I'd add a hamas analogy, like how Netanyahu propped up Hamas to prevent an actual government from forming. That is where we are in the states. And I just can't get people to listen. No one cares about my post and it is by far the one I most heavily share.
Allegedly the DNC emails have been down at Wikileaks for a while. But I used the Wayback Machine and as far as I could tell they were still available last Friday. That said, does the WM serve up an archived page w/ a search function that can go back even farther in the archives? I'm not 100% clear on how it works.
Thanks. I don't think I was very clear in how I worded that because I don't understand exactly how the Internet Archive works. Let me see if I can demonstrate what I was trying to say. It came about during an argument with someone on a different site. That person *insisted* that Wikileaks did NOT remove the DNC emails as a condition of, or after, Assange's plea deal and release and that they had been inaccessible ("404") for a while. My take, based on playing around with WayBack Machine was contrary to his assertion.
Same thing for June 17, I won't bother you with the link. However, I am positive that last time I checked, shortly after Assange's release, there was a snapshot from June 23. That is no longer the case. So I'll move back to May.
May 25 (any of the snapshots) returns the same error. I would swear on my life that this was NOT the case just last Friday (before this most recent Friday)!
So I was curious as to the workings of the IA. I suppose I could just be losing my mind, but I'm really not. Is it possible that I somehow searched something different? Anyway, when I simply search for https://wikileaks.org, roughly the earliest point I can get the DNC emails is mid-late 2022:
So my point (and question) is, either I really did lose my mind that night or I was searching farther back at the Internet Archive and not realizing it - so maybe it's actually true that the DNC emails have not been properly accessible on Wikileaks for more than a year, and that no action was taken on that 'archive' as a result of Julian Assange's plea bargain?
The conditions of the plea could have been in the works for months or even years, it'll be a year before we know all the details if ever. I'm inclined to believe you are right. It's certainly more plausible to me than "technical issues." (Which are no doubt caused by state actors anyway.)
All part of the show.
Offtopic but I thought you should know I'm slowly looking into your terrain theory stuff. https://substack.com/@innomen/note/c-59920222 I relayed your post to a trusted friend to help me parse. https://substack.com/home/post/p-136618915
Dig in! The "pandemic pathogen" is one big mythology created for control and profit.
It's not like the majority of believers attended the meeting to conspire. A step I'm taking in that direction is thinking about the goldfish analogy, and fleas. Recently I had to deal with them, and I didn't do it by taking something into me, I did it by attacking my room. Why should that logic not extend downward?
I'm trying to integrate the idea into a context I understand better, namely the macroscopic world. Also I'm reminded of carbon following heat instead of driving it. Also I'm reminded of pollutants, in the form of metals, PFOs, and endocrine disruptors. Even if some pathogens do exist terrain theory could provide a good holistic framework for parsing the larger system.
Like understanding economics generally over focusing on commodities.
I share all that with you to inform how you might better approach the topic with other fence sitters like myself, or those adjacent.
I understand your position, but just know they don't actually isolate viruses and the transmission studies are all failures. Nothing left to sit on but theory at that point.
That's much better, and borne out by everything I've seen so far, very well said. I have a huge list of failed transmission studies to explore, but do you have a link for the isolation aspect?
This latest work is very clever. They used the standard methodology for virus isolation without a sick host and still found viruses. It exposes virology as a completely unscientific field.
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/the-most-comprehensive-control-studies
It's occured to me as well that the much (supposedly) despised Trump will be the Elite's next pick for the WH to "move things along." 😀
I'm sure. It's been obvious to me for a long time. Another part of this effort is all the semi recent rehabilitation of former right wing monsters, like GW. They aren't fools, they know how to run a TV show. I wish you'd rewrite my gov post, maybe you'd have more luck waking people up to the fact that we literally don't have a government. https://innomen.substack.com/p/we-dont-have-a-government
I'll check it out. odds are I've been already thinking along the same lines. : )
I hope so but I'd be surprised, I haven't seen anyone else synthesize the DNC fraud lawsuit stuff with the princeton oligarchy study (and maybe banking) to arrive at government being a sham.
These days I'd add a hamas analogy, like how Netanyahu propped up Hamas to prevent an actual government from forming. That is where we are in the states. And I just can't get people to listen. No one cares about my post and it is by far the one I most heavily share.
Allegedly the DNC emails have been down at Wikileaks for a while. But I used the Wayback Machine and as far as I could tell they were still available last Friday. That said, does the WM serve up an archived page w/ a search function that can go back even farther in the archives? I'm not 100% clear on how it works.
Here are all the snapshots from 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20160315000000*/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
There's also a torrent up.
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1806061827601883554
Thanks. I don't think I was very clear in how I worded that because I don't understand exactly how the Internet Archive works. Let me see if I can demonstrate what I was trying to say. It came about during an argument with someone on a different site. That person *insisted* that Wikileaks did NOT remove the DNC emails as a condition of, or after, Assange's plea deal and release and that they had been inaccessible ("404") for a while. My take, based on playing around with WayBack Machine was contrary to his assertion.
Here's the last snapshot (of 2) taken yesterday, June 29: https://web.archive.org/web/20240629172652/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
It returns an Internal Server Error. OK, so let's move a little farther back in June 2024.
Here's the snapshot (of 3) on June 25, which I believe is when the plea was being finalized:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240629172652/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
Again, an Internal Server Error.
Same thing for June 17, I won't bother you with the link. However, I am positive that last time I checked, shortly after Assange's release, there was a snapshot from June 23. That is no longer the case. So I'll move back to May.
May 25 (any of the snapshots) returns the same error. I would swear on my life that this was NOT the case just last Friday (before this most recent Friday)!
So I was curious as to the workings of the IA. I suppose I could just be losing my mind, but I'm really not. Is it possible that I somehow searched something different? Anyway, when I simply search for https://wikileaks.org, roughly the earliest point I can get the DNC emails is mid-late 2022:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328073651/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
And the search function works. I tried the search term "Bernie" and this is the result:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201105023543/https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=Bernie&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult
So my point (and question) is, either I really did lose my mind that night or I was searching farther back at the Internet Archive and not realizing it - so maybe it's actually true that the DNC emails have not been properly accessible on Wikileaks for more than a year, and that no action was taken on that 'archive' as a result of Julian Assange's plea bargain?
Ahh I see. Well, a quick search gave me this intensely suspect hyper partisan report on the topic that strongly implies to me that the deletion was part of the deal expressly because they are playing the "conservative conspiracy" card. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikileaks-delete-dnc-emails-debunk-assange-plea-deal/
The conditions of the plea could have been in the works for months or even years, it'll be a year before we know all the details if ever. I'm inclined to believe you are right. It's certainly more plausible to me than "technical issues." (Which are no doubt caused by state actors anyway.)
See also: https://x.com/Innomen/status/1807565676833292412