With the WEF and their WHI taking the reins, upon their uncontested pronouncement if the next pl@ndemic or other security *crises", everything, from wars, to elections, to Wall Street, to scarcity of food or products, is a distraction. It's coming to full boil soon, probably in May, when the 190 countries with one delegate each, vote to allow them this status. Of course the billionaire who wants us all eating bugs, funds the WHO 80%>
Voting has limited local value, like propositions and local and state stuff can have some meaning, but when it comes to national policy at a minimum the data is simply unambiguous. It's a LARP, and it always has been. Even Washington was instantly mocked in Britain for going on about freedom this and that while owning slaves. It's obvious when people think for 5 minutes about it. But the distraction machine is epic at preventing that.
Yeah, I see no evidence you're wrong on a representative selection front. But what about direct propositions? They seem somewhat effective. The drive toward decriminalization seems to have mostly moved forward that way, though obviously far Far too slowly and ad hoc. Ultimately I agree. The whole project is a failure demonstrably we have failed to improve on hunting and gathering. We built the tools for ourselves, but failed to generate the required political will to use them. Hopefully I can reason with the AI gods after they arrive.
With the WEF and their WHI taking the reins, upon their uncontested pronouncement if the next pl@ndemic or other security *crises", everything, from wars, to elections, to Wall Street, to scarcity of food or products, is a distraction. It's coming to full boil soon, probably in May, when the 190 countries with one delegate each, vote to allow them this status. Of course the billionaire who wants us all eating bugs, funds the WHO 80%>
Bingo.
Thanks :)
Voting has limited local value, like propositions and local and state stuff can have some meaning, but when it comes to national policy at a minimum the data is simply unambiguous. It's a LARP, and it always has been. Even Washington was instantly mocked in Britain for going on about freedom this and that while owning slaves. It's obvious when people think for 5 minutes about it. But the distraction machine is epic at preventing that.
Yeah, I see no evidence you're wrong on a representative selection front. But what about direct propositions? They seem somewhat effective. The drive toward decriminalization seems to have mostly moved forward that way, though obviously far Far too slowly and ad hoc. Ultimately I agree. The whole project is a failure demonstrably we have failed to improve on hunting and gathering. We built the tools for ourselves, but failed to generate the required political will to use them. Hopefully I can reason with the AI gods after they arrive.