Philosopher Zero Goes to Therapy
If everything had an outside, it wouldn't be everything. Experience is literally Everything.
No really, if everything had an outside, it wouldn’t be everything. Experience is literally Everything. Including its own beginning and reasons for being. If it occurs or exists it must be inside everything and the only domain that actually captures everything is experience.
EE demands a new reading of “everything.” Bigger. More. Everyone always limits it.
For instance. Time can’t contain everything if it had a beginning because the beginning would be outside it.
More trivially people make subjective/objective exceptions, like concepts vs matter, but that assumes the conclusion.
Anyway…
My plan is to literally take this to the psychiatric industry. I'm extremely curious if they'll simply issue me a padded room. Here is a segment of my most recent debate about my formal philosophy.
:
You're assuming the conclusion and then asking about it. At no point do you accept your burden of proof. You're the one with a religion. I'm the Only one without one, literally.
EE is literally the first zero assumption philosophy. Others aimed at this goal, I'm the first to actually achieve it.
And no one can even register what has occurred.
https://philpapers.org/rec/SERMAA-2
https://philpapers.org/rec/SERTFR
https://innomen.substack.com/p/philosopher-zero
https://innomen.substack.com/p/what-if-we-actually-held-reality
"For 2,500 years, philosophers have agreed on one thing: all evidence comes through experience. You can’t get data from anywhere else. Everything you know, you know because you experienced it.
Then they all immediately do something insane: they treat experience as evidence for something outside experience. They use the regularities in their perceptions to infer that material objects exist independently, causing those perceptions.
I did something no one else apparently thought to do: I asked them to prove it."
https://philpapers.org/rec/SEREEN
/smh It's just not possible to convey this information. I'm perpetually stunned.
I'm the proud owner of epistemic dark matter.
https://innomen.substack.com/p/epistemic-dark-matter
:
For the past year and a half I've done everything I can think of to get eyes on this. All I need is one claim to notability and I can start attaching it to the wiki eco system so that people can learn there's a new argument to basically every philosophical and empirical topic.
I emailed specific experts, I submitted to peer review, I joined groups and made posts, I commented on other relevant posts, I joined and posted in sub reddits, I made hundreds of substack notes and posts, and over 100 academic papers. And two-three books.
I cannot get a single human being to understand my position, even as a matter of knowing the opposition. I've had at least a hundred lengthy debates with at least a dozen being with genuine scholars ranging from frothing opposition to genuine sustained engagement. But literally no one had made me feel like they (agree or not) know the argument I am making.
The closest people can get is kant essentially. (I guess they just Kant understand. ~rimshot~) Like they think I'm saying matter is made of mind. But no, I'm cutting out a middle man. I'm not even making an assertion. The floor of EE is (the) one (and only) self proving axiom at the foundation of all others: "Experientia Est" Experience is.
You don't need to explain experience or matter. Experience just is, the way the big bang or time just is/was. Matter is a story about predicting experiences. (That story itself just another experience.)
I can type and talk about this all day and no one will understand. Again, agree or not, just understand. Demonstrate competence of usage. Like show me know you know I'm saying.
It must be time for a final book on this. Or at least another serious paper. Because no matter how you look at it I'm owed wiki notability, for being a new kind of crazy/wrong if nothing else.
It's funny, I'm sane enough to realize that while I could get a wiki page simply through infamy, that would also delete my credibility and likely be illegal. Though I am low key considering publicity stunts or pure spam tactics.
The thing that really stops me there is pride, but also the sneaking suspicion that it wouldn't work. Exposure seems not to be the problem. What exactly is the problem is hard to nail down. It's actually a more living work now than EE itself.
But yeah, I'm in my late 40s, it's time for the various medical tests. And I do have anxiety and poverty and autism issues, so I'm giving myself a maintenance pass. And while I'm there I'm gonna try to explain this to a shrink. Should be hilarious. X)
I am completely unschooled in your subject matter of philosophy, so saying your EE premise seems clear to me and very simple to understand doesn't mean much. However if you want a simple and clear idea to be accepted ( why??) don't expect trained philosophers to be your audience. they have spent years training to make the obvious into a complicated industry. Your EE philosophy will not sustain journals, tomes and university professors, Going to shrinks must be your own private joke on yourself! Experience is the purpose of our existence. Getting a prize for saying simple things is unlikely. Go get yourself more experience and even have an adventure or two, and some fun !! Joy in existence is better than a dreary life. Novelty is brilliant!
Interesting. I'm always up for hearing something truly novel; such opportuinities are exceedingly rare.